It is therefore a short and relatively simple business statement. Nevertheless, the authors do not praise describing the economic situation and listing the reasons that led to the signing of the agreement. Traders believe that taxes are heavy, frustrating and restrictive for colonial trade. In addition, some, led by John Dickinson, argued that the taxes were a violation of their rights. They also expressed a dilemma as to whether such taxes could pose a potential threat to American freedom. In addition to ideas and doubts, the document also contained statements on trade agreed by the signatory dealers. In protest of the British Crown`s Townshend Act, which set taxes on a large number of goods, Boston merchants and traders entered into an agreement not to import or export goods to the United Kingdom. Although patriots like to say otherwise, not everyone agrees with non-import and non-consumption movements. Some settlers agreed with them, buying, importing or selling British products. In August 1769, the offenders were revealed on the front page of the Boston Chronicle. The news of the violations has devastating effects on the boycott, as does the importation of traders who mock patriots and their search for “tiny packages” that could contain contraband.
Parliament finally responded to the protests by abolishing the townshend taxes in 1770, with the exception of the tea tax that Prime Minister Lord North kept to assert “the right to taxation of Americans.” This partial abolition of taxes was enough to put an end to the non-import movement until October 1770. From 1771 to 1773, British tea was again imported in significant quantities into the colonies, with merchants paying the Townshend tax of three pence per pound. Boston was the largest colonial importer of legal tea; Smugglers still dominated the New York and Philadelphia markets. Such agreements appeared as early as 1766. They had a deterrent effect on the British traders who acted with the colonies. The stamp law was eventually repealed on the basis of calls from merchants who lost money, shipped goods to a country they did not receive. It is no coincidence that colonial customs were not able to levy taxes on goods that were not left ashore or were never sold. Non-import agreements came into effect in response to the Townshend Revenue Act when Boston passed legislation in 1768.
Every port city and almost every region would soon accept such acts. Finally, in 1774, the first continental congress of the colonies would pass through the Association, a colonial prohibition against all trade with Great Britain. Although Sons of Liberty`s involvement was indisputable in the affairs of the non-import agreements, they were not the only ones opposing British rule. At the time without British luxury goods, tea or textiles, there seemed to be an opportunity for patriotic women to play a role in public affairs.  Although they did not join the public protest, they formed a strong group called Daughters of Liberty. Instead, they contributed to the manufacture of products when non-import agreements came into force and led to deficits in British products, particularly textiles. They spin yarn and knit yarn into fabric.  They also decided to join the initiative to boycott English tea, instead using various herbs and plants such as mint or raspberry. Often, these women run either a household or even a small store. This allowed them to choose the goods they wanted to buy and the goods they wanted to boycott. As a result, they have had a huge impact on non-imports and their effectiveness.
Throughout 1770 Boston merchants tried unsuccessfully to renew the non-import agreement.